A woman is beaten to the point of exhaustion by her husband. Then
she is brutally raped. She endures this abuse for years on end. Finally, she summons all the courage she has. When her husband
beats her yet again, rapes her again and leaves, she runs to a neighbor. The kind neighbor convinces her to call the police.
The woman, although very afraid, bravely calls the police. The police arrive. They take pictures of the woman's bruises
-- both old and new. The police then obtain the husband's whereabouts from the wife and arrest him. Sometime later there
is a trial. The husband is found guilty and made to serve 15 years. Later, the woman goes to counseling, and amazingly, uses
the counseling sessions she has learned to go to college to help other victims of domestic violence.
What led to the eventual end of this poor woman's abuse? GOING
PUBLIC. Publicly disclosing the abuse ended the woman's cycle of abuse.
The same is true for societal abuse. Perpetrators of societal abuse use their
positions of power to strengthen themselves at the expense of their victims. Publicly exposing their abuse warns others and
helps to create a group of individuals who can successfully fight the abuser.
Perpetrators of societal abuse do not always limit their oppressive conduct to
one particular region. On many occasions, these societal bullies force their behavior on the international community.
Why did the European Jewish community engage in the slander of Africans?
It stands to reason that if not for deriving a sadistic glee from watching others suffer, there must be some other advantage
for them to render Africans to be beneath public contempt.
The main advantage of ruining the reputation
of a person or group of persons is the ability to engage them in an unethical, immoral or illegal fashion for unjust profit.
Once the group's character is effectively assassinated, the group must rely on some entity to reestablish the group's
character. In such a case, the victim often has to depend on the slanderous entity itself to reacquire that which was originally
stolen by the slanderous entity. The slanderous entity then makes regaining the destroyed reputation a privilege -- not a
right.
As stated under the subheading entitled The Maafa,
there are past occasions where some members of the European Jewish community have engaged in underpaying their African servants,
using the pejorative term "schvartzes" in their description of them. The website http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/exploit.htm explains how in the 1930s, unemployed Black women would hope to be hired by Bronx women to
do housework for fifteen to thirty cents an hour (emphasis added) and that most of these housewives were Jewish.
Although not restricted to the European Jewish community, some members of the
European Jewish community regularly hire individuals who are negatively viewed by the public. Africans in the Diaspora are
not the only individuals who are "consigned" to engage in unethical or illegal conduct at the behest of middle-class
and wealthy European Jews. Ethnic groups and societal outcasts (i.e. illegal aliens) against which the media has offered negative
publicity are no strangers to oppression. Groups entitled "illegal aliens," ex-convicts and others are often underpaid,
due in part, to their nonexistent reputations and the public's lack of sympathy for their plight.
The European Jewish community's promulgation of the myth of
the inferiority of dark skin is also perpetrated against dark-skinned Jews in Israel.
Author Roberta Strauss Feuerlicht, in the book The Fate of the Jews explains the European
Jewish Israeli's treatment of darker-skinned Jews: "Sephardic Jews have menial jobs and less education; they live
in overcrowded rooms in overcrowded slums. They are Israel's blacks; some Ashkenazic women refer to their Sephardic maid
as the "schvartze."
Ms. Feuerlicht goes
on to say: "Sephardic children go to schools where they learn about Ashkenazic
heroes and European culture; their own culture is ignored or denigrated. There is a high rate of juvenile delinquency and
petty crime among them. According to Yakim, when a crime is committed in a Sephardic community, the police don't necessarily
look for the criminal; instead there is collective punishment. A group of Sephardim are rounded up, beaten, and released."
Reuven Abargel, a member of Israel's former Black Panthers Party, and now a founding member of the Mizrahi Democratic
Rainbow, is a member of Israel's dark-skinned Mizrahim majority. http://www.sfbayview.com/070506/israeliblack070506.shtml explains how Reuven Abargel, a North African Jew, describes the oppression
and degradation of the North African/Middle Eastern Mizrahi Jews at the hands of Israel's European Jewish minority:
"The Mizrahim in Israel went through a sophisticated process of oppression under the guise of slogans such as "we
are all brothers" and "we are all Jews." While the Ashkenazi establishment beamed with "solidarity"
toward us, it committed crimes against us, such as medical experiments in radioactive radiation of about 100,000 children,
almost all of whom are immigrants from North Africa, the kidnapping of children from large Mizrahi families to transfer them
to childless European Jewish couples, and the exclusion of Mizrahi Jews from Israel’s educational institutions and centers
of influence.
Mr. Abargel,
as well as fellow Mizrahi Jews learned about the struggles of the original Black Panthers Party in the United States, known
far and wide for its active stance against the United States' oppressive apartheid government. Hearing of the Black Panthers
Party's exploits, Mizrahi Jews soon adopted the same name.
At the aforementioned website, it states that "while the Euro-American Ashkenazi
Jews who dominated Israel’s founding Labour Party spoke of the "ingathering" of these immigrants as part of
fulfilling the Zionist dream, in reality they were seen as inferior "human material" and were desired mainly as
a source of cheap labor. As such, they were consigned to living situations which at times approximated the treatment of Mexican
immigrants to America’s farmland. Some had their children kidnapped and given to childless Ashkenazi couples while others
were used as guinea pigs in Nazi-like medical experiments."
The same
sentiments are mirrored in the periodical The Green Left. In its article entitled "Israel -- Divided By Racism,
dated July 30, 1997, it says the following: "From the early days of the Zionist project, large numbers of Jews from neighbouring
Arab countries were brought to Palestine. Ostensibly they were "returning home", but in reality they came as cheap
labour for their European counterparts (Ashkenazi Jews). These Arab Jews were given the name Mizrahim (the eastern ones).
Official Israeli history presents the emigration of Mizrahi as a result of anti-Semitism within the countries where they lived
or a religious devotion to the land of Palestine. This account forgets the economic interests of the Ashkenazi Zionists and
the long and largely untroubled relationship between Mizrahi Jews and the other Arabs with whom they lived. Mizrahim had lived
in North Africa and the Middle East for millennia, and the vast majority were opposed to creating a Jewish state in Palestine.
The Iraqi Jewish leadership, for example, cooperated with the Iraqi government to stop Zionist activity in Iraq; the chief
rabbi published an open letter denouncing Zionism. In 1920, Palestinian Jews signed anti-Zionist petitions denouncing Ashkenazi
rule. It is now well documented that Zionist underground cells planted bombs in Jewish centres to create hysteria amongst
Iraqi Jews, hoping to encourage a mass exodus to Israel. On January 14, 1951, a bomb was thrown into an Iraqi synagogue, killing
four people ... The Mizrahim who arrived in Israel landed in corrugated iron transit camps where Israeli officials attempted
to strip them of their "Arabness" by getting rid of their "unpronounceable" Arab names and replacing them
with good "Jewish" names. Most ended up in agricultural work, 10-12 hours a day in conditions of disease and squalor.
Their high death rate was explained by one Zionist official as a "common and natural thing." One particularly damning
example of the European approach to Mizrahim was the infamous "kidnapped children of Yemen" affair. Doctors, social
workers and nurses worked together to kidnap 600 Yemeni-Jewish babies, telling their parents they had died and giving them
to childless Ashkenazi couples.1
(Please read
this article).
In the Israeli newspaper Ha Aretz, it reported that Mevasseret
Zion Mayor Carmi Gillon, a European Jewish Israeli made disparaging comments regarding the dark-skinned Ethiopian Jewish immigrants
living in the town's absorption center. Mr. Gillon stated: "There is a phenomenon of vandalism by the absorption
center's children ... who destroy, break and paw through trash cans." According to Ha Aretz, sources said
that Gillon has been trying for some time to get rid of the absorption center because the land on which it sits is worth a
lot of money. The newspaper article also states that Roni Givoni, who heads a group of Mevasseret residents who aid the immigrants,
said: "... It's a combination of economic motives, racism and plain old stupidity. He added that he believes that
Gillon deliberately painted a harsh picture in an effort to get more money from the Absorption Ministry.
Most people do not know that the European Jewish community's
anti-black-skin, anti-dark-skin racism is not just restricted to the Americas, Western Europe and perhaps South Africa.
Based on the foregoing, it is clear that European Jewish-controlled Israel has a history of discriminating against darker-skinned
African and Middle Eastern Jews. Of those who believe in the European Jewish community's preoccupation with maligning
individuals who are dark-skinned, very few have clearly seen what amounts to be an international pattern of abuse against
dark-skinned people. One need only visit Jewish enclaves like Boro Park and Williamsburg, both in Brooklyn, New York, where
construction work is being performed by the darker-skinned Mexicans. One can rest assured that these individuals, more than
likely illegal aliens, make no more than $10.00 per hour for work that should be at least $40.00 per hour.
Of course, there is a downside to the victims, and an upside to
the slanderous entity that disseminates the defamatory comments. As in the past, just as rich white landowners pitted poor
whites against enslaved Africans in each other's quest to acquire the rich white entity's financial "crumbs,"
the same is done to poor and almost-poor Americans who are skipped over by white-run financial entities and replaced with
desperate laborers who are forced to work in dumb silence as a result of being publicly labeled "illegal aliens."
Both groups are pitted against each other in such a way that neither group pays attention to the slanderous entity that started
the problem in the first place.
Members of white Christian hate groups are no doubt descendants of poor whites who, because of the European Jewish community's
promulgation of the slanderous myth regarding the curse of Ham in the past, were tricked into believing that dark-skinned
African people are condemned by God to be enslaved. There are even those among them who believe that African people should
be eradicated from the planet. Unbelievably, even they are victims. First, they are victims of being racists -- said racism
a direct outgrowth of the European Jewish community's past promulgation of the myth of the inferiority of dark skin. Then,
they are victims of the European Jewish community's attempt to pit poor racist whites against poor dark-skinned people
to disenfranchise both groups, thereby diverting negative attention away from themselves and maintaining a false air of righteousness.
Lastly, the bear the shame of being the originators of the doctrine of dark-skin inferiority/white supremacy -- a doctrine
that was given life by European Jewish teachings.
The
descendants of those Europeans Jews who promulgated this slanderous myth should want to do all
they can to condemn their ancestors' behavior and to dispel any reminders of this monstrous lie. However, for Africans
and other dark-skinned ethnic groups, the present European Jewish community not only refuses to publicly debunk the European
Jewish-fomented dark-skin-inferiority myth, but has done all in its power to prevent its public disclosure. By its silence
regarding the existence and promulgation of this myth, the European Jewish community has condoned anti-black racism and has
become, at the very least, an accessory to crimes committed against dark-skinned people. At the very most, it has become an
accomplice.
On November 30, 1998,
Abraham H. Foxman of the Anti Defamation League reportedly conducted a survey's called the Index of Anti-Semitic Belief.
According to this survey, "one segment of American society, Jew-hatred is still strong among African-Americans."
Furthermore, it states that 34% of black Americans fit into the ADL's category of most anti-Semitic" and that "34
percent of black Americans fit into the ADL's category of most anti-Semitic. That is compared to only 9 percent of the
general population."
Amazingly, this survey plays into the
European Jewish religiously-fomented slanderous myth that was promulgated against Africans hundreds of years ago. In his book,
Legends of the Jews, Louis Ginzberg writes: "The last will and testament of Canaan addressed to his children read
as follows: "...hate your master with an exceeding great hate..."2 It almost appears as though the results of Abraham Foxman's survey were designed to buttress Mr. Ginzberg
slanderous myth regarding the dark-skinned so-called "sons" of Ham.
The European
Jewish community does all that it can to fight against the Christian doctrine that the Jews were responsible for the
murder of Jesus. Members of the Anti Defamation in Florida went so far as to say: "The Passion of the Christ" continues
its unambiguous portrayal of Jews as being responsible for the death of Jesus."3 Well, the myth regarding the curse of Ham/dark skin is no different. It started hundreds of years ago. It
still exists. It is still taught by certain rabbis within the Jewish community. If the Jewish community feels it has a responsibility
to fight against centuries-old religiously-fomented slanderous Christian doctrines, don't African Americans have the responsbility
to do the same? That this slanderous European Jewish teaching emanates from the Jewish community should not frighten us --
it should impel us to fight harder.
European Jewish organizations like the Anti-Defamation League feel they have a right to know whether African Americans
are anti-Semitic. Well, guess what? There are no African American religions that teach that white skin is the sign of God's
curse. However, European Judaism does teach that black skin is the sign of God's curse. African Americans have a right and a responsibility
to force the European Jewish community to disclose not just the slanderous Jewish myth, but the current practice of slandering
African. Africans also have a right to determine the extent of anti-African/anti-black skin hatred in the European Jewish
community.
The European Jewish community's centuries-old
practice of publicly defaming dark-skinned people is oftentimes part of an overall onslaught that can be described as its
"ultimate weapon." What is this ultimate weapon? How is it used?
Learning the
use of their "ultimate weapon" affords Africans the opportunity
to prepare for such an onslaught — and to fight back successfully.
Footnotes:
1 http://www.greenleft.org.au/1997/283/16448
2http://classiclit.about.com/library/bl-etexts/lginzberg/bl-lginzberg-legends-1-4h.htm
3 http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASUS_12/4444_12.htm
